OES a person's death seal their fate for all eternity? Many
Christians and Bible scholars of our day, basing their answer on
Hebrews 9:27, believe this to be the case. It is
believed that all one can do for good or for bad, as well as the
opportunity to obtain salvation ends at death. After which occurs
this judgment, which is supposedly a review of how one lived
their life as well as the eternal sentence; ether to life
eternal, or to eternal damnation. "Judgment Day" to many is seen as a time where all
who have lived throughout the ages, one by one stand before God
to have their good works weighed against their sins. Others see
the last judgment as a time where only the unsaved dead are
raised in order to confess finally and by constraint that Jesus
is Lord, after which they are cast into an eternal hellfire of
torment.
Clearly, according to scripture, there is a great day of God's
judgment coming as foretold in Revelation chapter 20:
And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on
it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and
there was found no place for them.
And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and
the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is
the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those
things which were written in the books, according to their
works.
And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and
hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were
judged every man according to their works.
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is
the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was
cast into the lake of fire.
Rev 20:11-15
SOME DISTURBING
THOUGHTS
If the passage above were all the information we had been given about the
last great day of judgment, then perhaps I may be able to agree
with the common views previously stated. However,
what many may not be aware of is that this day of judgment is
spoken of in dozens upon dozens of scriptures.
One thing which I find very troubling is that most people will
never hear the many passages which clarify, and detail exactly what this
judgment entails preached from the pulpits of
their churches.
In studying dozens of commentaries on these passages,
something became very clear to me: Most "orthodox"
commentators and scholars simply refuse to believe what the
scriptures say concerning the true nature of the last judgment.
It seems as if most have decided in their own minds what this
judgment must be and then proceed through scripture
twisting and explaining away anything which will not bend to
their view.
I am fully convinced that the final judgment of mankind is not
a time in which God commits billions to everlasting flames of
torment for all eternity. I am equally convinced that any
unbiased person who examines all the scriptures pertaining to
the last judgment will agree that they simply do not, and indeed
CAN NOT be made to teach the popular theories of evangelical
theology. I would ask any sincere student of God's Word; If you could
be shown from the scriptures that this 'day of judgment' is not for
the sentencing the majority of humanity to eternal
hellfire, but to instruct them in righteousness that they may
find a place of repentance and salvation, wouldn't you rejoice in
that truth?
Even though I'm convinced that this is exactly what the Bible
does teach, to my shock and dismay, most who claim to be
Christians simply refuse to hear it. They refuse to
believe that their God could do anything to save anyone once they
have passed on in death. To me, this is most disturbing. What is
it about modern evangelicalism, and fundamentalism, that makes them want
to believe that God will torment billions of men, women, and
children for all eternity? Of course, those who cling to this
position will accuse me of misrepresentation, claiming that they
are constrained to believe the scriptures, no matter how
disturbing, even though they take no pleasure in it.
Friends, this simply will not do. Even in our day of global
television ministries, missionary movements, and things of the
like, over two-thirds of world's population remains totally
heathen. This number is not counting Catholics, all
Protestant denominations, Jews, and Muslims. Over SIXTY-SIX
percent of all men, women and children alive on this planet this
very moment will never in their lifetime so much as hear the one
name given among men whereby we must be saved. Add to this the
countless billions upon billions from ages past which never knew
of the true God, or of true faith. What becomes of them?
The one question which most Christians fear above all others
is the one which asks:
"What happens to all the billions of people who never
heard the gospel, or had a chance to be saved?"
The evangelical and fundamentalist must ultimately concede
that in their view, these people are utterly and eternally lost
though most are rarely ever so bold as to state that matter
explicitly.
In reply to this I must ask:
Why would an infinitely wise God first create billions upon
billions of souls knowing fully and completely that MOST
(let's just be honest about it) would never find him, and in fact
BLIND them so they couldn't find him, knowing that their ultimate
destiny most be eternal torment in hellfire?
But even more puzzling:
Why would an infinitely wise God send his only begotten,
beloved son, to suffer, be tortured, and die for a relative
FRACTION of humanity?
Is this the wisdom of our God, and of our Bible? The only
answer I can give is an emphatic 'NO', and thank God that it is
so. The scriptures reveal a much grander plan than mankind could
ever fathom. A plan which only an infinite wisdom could ever
conceive or carry out. A plan which involves every man, woman,
and child to whom God ever gave the breath of life.
I hope that this study brings comfort to those who fear that their loved ones
may have gone to hell because they failed
to be "saved" in this lifetime, but even more I pray
that it brings glory and honor to God; the author and architect
of such a wondrous hope.
O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of
God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past
finding out!
SHEEP AND GOATS
When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and
all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the
throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall
separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his
sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the
goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come,
ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you
from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty,
and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I
was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when
saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave
thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked,
and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto
thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say
unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least
of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart
from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the
devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was
thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye
clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we
thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or
sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you,
Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye
did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but
the righteous into life eternal.
Matt 25:31-46
This passage from Matthew's Gospel, commonly referred to as
"the parable of the sheep and the goats" has caused
untold confusion in the minds of many. We will begin our study of
the judgment here.
Once again, in reviewing numerous commentaries on this passage
one can readily see that almost no two scholars agree on the
meaning.
Actually, the meaning of the passage seems clear enough. There
really isn't much in the passage which would seem to cause too
much difficulty. So what's the problem? Why all the difficulty
and controversy surrounding this passage? The answer is that the
passage is not easily harmonized with the teachings of most
mainstream denominations; particularly those which teach that works
play no part in one's salvation and never will in any age. This
makes the problem very apparent.
Here we have detailed for us a judgment which is clearly based
on works. The only difference between the "sheep" and
the "goats" is what they did and didn't do. In
addition to this, we have the following problems:
It seems as though the timing of this judgment is not easily
reconciled with the popular evangelical theology. Catholics in their zeal
to maintain a works based salvation say that this sheep and goats judgment must refer to the
last "great white throne" judgment of Revelation
Chapter 20. From this comes the popular belief that salvation is
obtained when one's good works outweigh their bad.
Others feel that this judgment cannot refer to the last great
white throne judgment, but instead a judgment upon nations
and not individuals. In this view the 'sheep and goats' judgment is seen as taking
place at the second advent immediately following the "great
tribulation". The judgment is conducted to see which nations
go into the millennial blessings and which do not.
Like everyone else, I of course have my own opinions on the
passage. I believe that those who are earnestly desiring to find
the truth should be very disturbed by the wholesale lack of
agreement between "scholars" on what appears to be a
very simple teaching.. I do not, and can not believe that we were
ever intended to be left in the dark on these things. Consider
the words of the Apostle:
Therefore leaving the principles of
the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto
perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance
from dead works, and of faith toward God,Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and
of resurrection of the dead, and of
eternal judgment. Heb. 6:12
These doctrines were to be absolutely fundamental and well
understood. The apostle urges that it's time to move on and
stop rehashing these things over and over. How sad that in our
day very few could even give a detailed scriptural explanation of
what they believe, let alone WHY they actually believe it.
One reason I began writing this study in the first place was pure frustration. I know
that my own opinion will simply amount to another "voice in
the crowd" among those who simply cannot agree. Ultimately
the real question is; Is the Bible really this hard to
understand? Is the same Spirit leading all these scholars to all
these different interpretations? Maybe it's time that we
re-examine our motives behind why we believe the way we do. I
only ask that whoever reads this will be honest with themselves
when examining the scriptures pertaining to the last judgment. Isn't it time that we let the Word of God speak for itself instead on
constantly parroting the party line from the commentaries and creeds?
TIMING OF THE JUDGMENT
I believe that the key to understanding the parable of the sheep
and the goats lies in discovering its timing. After
all, there are only so many judgments recorded in the Bible,
especially those of the magnitude talked about here. It's
impossible for me to believe that Jesus foretold such a
monumental event, and have it nowhere else corroborated in
scripture. The more scriptural information we can bring to bear
on the subject, the better prepared we will be to decipher the
parable.
First of all, it must be understood that we are in fact
dealing with a PARABLE. As such, it's used to represent and
illustrate a truth, not to give an exact representation of what
will happen. Obviously Jesus isn't going to separate literal
sheep and goats. It is however this strictly literal
interpretation which has led many to conjure up images of a 24
hour time period where all, one by one line up to give account to
God. Those deemed worthy of life are gathered to the right, while
the wicked to the left.
Anyone should be able to see that such an interpretation is
absurd. Even so, we can determine some things as fact:
- Whenever this judgment occurs, it takes place AFTER the
second advent.
When the Son of man shall come in his
glory, and all the holy angels with
him, then shall he sit
upon the throne of his glory
-
It denotes a great time of separating which is to include
ALL nations.
before him shall be gathered all
nations: and he shall separate
them one from another, as a shepherd
divideth his sheep from the goats
- There is a clearly defined criteria for judgment, it it
is clearly works based dealing with Christ's
"brethren":
For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was
thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye
took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye
visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me... Inasmuch
as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my
brethren, ye have done it unto me
- The ultimate outcome is "eternal life" for the
righteous, and everlasting fire for the wicked:
And these shall go away into everlasting punishment:
but the righteous into life eternal
In trying to determine exactly when this judgment takes place,
and knowing clearly from the text that it must follow the second advent, it should be understood that our options are already quite
limited. This should make things easier for us. Since we
know for certainty that this judgment follows the second coming,
and that the "great white throne" judgment follows the
1000 year reign of Christ (Revelation 20), most see only two options.
Either this judgment takes place after the second coming but
before the 1000 reign, or if after the 1000 year reign it is in fact a another description
given of the last judgment in Revelation 20. These, it is commonly thought, are our only
options. Those who don't believe in a literal 1000 year reign of
Christ on earth have it real easy.. they limit themselves to only one option.
The pre-millennialists must decide if the 'sheep and goats'
judgment is a picture of the last
"great white throne" judgment, or if it's a separate
judgment upon nations immediately after the second advent, but
preceding the millennium. Almost all will take the later option
based on the following reasons:
-
The sheep and goats judgment takes place on earth, whereas in the great white
throne judgment, heaven and earth are said to have fled away.
-
The criteria of the sheep and goats judgment is works, where in the great white
throne judgment the criteria is the book of life
-
The sheep and goats judgment is upon the living where no mention of a
resurrection is made, whereas the great white throne
judgment is for the "unrighteous dead", all
which are damned and cast into the lake of fire.
We want to make clear that the above is not our position, but that of those
who believe the 'sheep and goats' judgment to be a separate event between the
second advent and the millennium Some may give other reasons in addition to
those above but they are generally the "big
three".
If we reject those reasons listed above then it would seem
that our ONLY other option is to assume the
Christ here is giving another picture of the last judgment as described in Revelation 20.
In my opinion, although the standard pre-millennial answer seems to make valid
points, we simply must choose the second option, that the sheep and goats
parable points to the Great White Throne judgment of Revelation 20.
While the pre-millennialists feel they have "rightly
divided the word" by inserting a separate judgment between
the advent and the millennium, they have in fact created more
problems than they have solved. If we carefully examine the
passages relating the second advent, we will see that such an
interpretation is impossible.
Consider the following:
Those who teach that this judgment immediately follows the second advent maintain that those who are saved do so by helping the
Jews (Christ's "brethren") during the great
tribulation. While this sounds plausible, there are problems.
First of all, every passage relating to the second advent
shows that the wicked are destroyed AT Christ's coming, not
following his coming in separate judgment. The picture is always
the same; Those who are watching for Christ, or have turned to
Christ in faith during the coming tribulation are protected,
while the wicked are taken in SWIFT, COMPLETE JUDGMENT. This
picture will simply not fit the one given in the parable:
When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all
the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne
of his glory:
And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall
separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his
sheep from the goats
Second, we are told very clearly in Revelation chapter 7 what
criteria was used for those who escape "the great
tribulation":
And one of the elders answered, saying unto me,
What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence
came they? And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great
tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white
in the blood of the Lamb. Rev 7:13-14
These are obviously saved by faith in Christ, not by good
works in helping out the Jews.
However, it is the outcome of the parable which tells
us that we can be sure that the standard pre-millennial interpretation is incorrect. Please notice carefully this picture
of the second advent from Revelation 19:
And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse;
and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in
righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were
many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but
he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his
name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon
white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he
should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod
of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and
wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name
written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS. And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with
a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst
of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the
supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of
captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of
horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all
men, both free and bond, both small and great.
And I saw the beast, and the kings of the
earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war
against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet
that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them
that had received the mark of the beast, and them that
worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake
of fire burning with brimstone. And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat
upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and
all the fowls were filled with their flesh.
Revelation 19:11-21
Now notice very carefully: There is simply no time here to sit on a throne in
judgment. ALL who are not under divine protection are
gathered here. But notice very carefully what happens to them:
And the remnant were slain
with the sword of him that sat
upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and
all the fowls were filled with their flesh.
No one here is sentenced to "everlasting fire prepared
for the devil and his angels". These are simply KILLED.
Someone might say, "well they died and went to hell".
But this won't work either. Notice:
And the beast
was taken, and with him the false
prophet that wrought miracles
before him, with which he deceived them that had received the
mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both
were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. And the remnant were slain with the sword
Why are the beast and false prophet thrown into to lake of
fire, but NO ONE ELSE??
Clearly this isn't the same picture as the "sheep and
goats" parable. There can't be any judgment upon the nations
immediately following this where Christ sits on the throne of His glory, because he just killed all the wicked at his coming!
There aren't any goats left to judge!
Notice Again:
For as in the days that were before the flood they
were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage,
until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and
took them ALL away;
so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Matt
24:38-39
A note in Henry Morris's' "Defenders Study Bible"
shows how he recognizes this problem, but still attempts to force
the passage to conform to his theology:
"Although multitudes will have been slain during this
period -believers by the Antichrist and unbelievers by the
great plagues and by Christ at Armageddon- some
will survive, and these must be the ones appearing before the
Lord for Judgment." Defender's Study Bible pg. 1047
emphasis mine
Notice how Henry Morris admits that the Bible doesn't seem to teach
this doctrine, but maintains that his interpretation MUST be true
anyway.
Contrast this with the words of Paul:
For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the
Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety;
then sudden
destruction cometh upon them, as travail
upon a woman with child; and they shall not
escape. 1 Thes 5:2-3
In addition, the picture of a few escaping judgment at
Armageddon doesn't seem to fit the picture which Christ has given
us:
When the Son of man shall come in his glory,
and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne
of his glory:
32 And before him shall be gathered all
nations: and he shall separate them one
from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the
goats:
Does Christ sit on "the throne of his glory" and
judge a remnant only? Does the picture of "all nations"
being gathered fit with the view that this judgment is
over a mere remnant which somehow escape God's wrath at Christ's coming?
We must conclude that the "sheep and goats" judgment
cannot be a separate judgment sandwiched between the advent and
the millennium. Our only other option is to admit that Christ must
here be giving us another picture of the last great white throne
judgment from Revelation 20, however in doing so we will arrive
at a much different view of what is actually contained within
this judgment.
THE REAL
PROBLEM
I feel that the real trouble in understanding the parable of
the Sheep and the Goats comes from a complete misunderstanding of
Revelation 20 and the picture of the judgment given there. If you
open up almost any study Bible, the "Great White Throne
Judgment" is almost always dubbed "the Judgment of the
unsaved dead". Scholars seem to have come to the conclusion
that all who come up in the second resurrection, and who
stand before the great white throne are lost. THIS is
the main reason why they cannot reconcile the passage with our
Lord's words in Matthew 25 where some are saved and others lost.
They do not believe that there are any "sheep" before
the great white throne.
I believe that a careful study will show that Revelation 20 is
highly misunderstood. Once we carefully study it along with many
other scriptures pertaining to the judgment, we will see that it
in fact harmonizes perfectly with the description Jesus gave us
in Matthew 25. Instead of foretelling the doom of countless
billions of people it actually tells of a great hope which will
be held out to all.
A RESURRECTION TO
DAMNATION?
In John Chapter 5 Jesus states:
Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the
which all that are in the graves
shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done
good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done
evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
John 5:28-29
Our standard King James translation of this verse has caused
untold confusion. Comparing the phrase "resurrection to
damnation" with Revelation 20, many assume that if the first
resurrection is the resurrection to life Jesus spoke of:..
This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first
resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but
they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign
with him a thousand years. Rev 20:5b-6
...then it must follow that the second resurrection where the
dead appear before the great white throne MUST be the
resurrection to damnation. This in fact is why many
assume that ALL who appear in the great white throne judgment are
lost.
However, we must admit that if John chapter 5 can be shown to
not necessitate condemnation and damnation, then neither
will Revelation 20. Notice the following from Revelation 20 and
the picture of the last judgment:
And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before
God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened,
which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of
those things which were written in the books, according to
their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death
and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they
were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This
is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in
the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Rev 20:12-15
This passage simply does not say what many would like
it to; namely that ALL in this judgment are lost. In fact, the
passage seems to imply exactly the opposite. In stating that
whosoever was not found in the book of life are lost, it would
seem to imply that some WERE in fact found written there. The
presence of the book of life in the passage is something most
fundamentalist commentators wish didn't exist. They have gone to
great lengths to attempt to explain what it's doing at the
judgment of the "unsaved dead".
Additionally, one might ask: If these are already unsaved, and
have no hope for life, then why raise them in the first place?
Let's be perfectly honest when dealing with the text. Nothing
in Revelation 20 demands that all in this
judgment are lost. On the contrary, implication is made that some
in this judgment are in fact saved. But what about the
"resurrection to damnation" from John 5?
The Greek word translated "damnation" in John 5 is krisis,
and corresponds exactly with our English word
"crisis". In almost every other New Testament
occurrence this same word has been translated
"judgment".
Dr. Thayer gives the following as his first and primary
definition of the word:
2920 krisis-
1) a separating, a sundering, a separation;
a trial, a contest
If we study the way this word is used throughout the New
Testament, we can readily see that "damnation" is by no
means a fair translation. Consider the following:
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with
his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment
(Gk. krisis) : and whosoever shall say to
his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but
whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of
hell fire (Gk. Gehenna-- the most severe sentence). Matthew 5:22
In this passage, the krisis is clearly not equal to
damnation, nor even the "council" for that matter. To
translate krisis as "damnation" here would
make the passage nonsense.
In no way does the "resurrection to krisis"
in John 5 necessitate that all who come up in that resurrection
are lost. It does however mean that they come up to a trial, a
contest, a time of testing, and a crisis.
Again, from the book of Acts we see how Paul talks about this
judgment, but once again never implies that all who enter into it
are lost:
But this I confess unto thee, that after the way
which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers,
believing all things which are written in the law and in the
prophets: And have hope
toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there
shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and
unjust. Acts 24:14-15
Notice that to Paul, the resurrection is a subject of hope,
not for the just only, but also for the unjust.
Once we can comprehend that the "judgment" does not
mean condemnation and damnation for every one
who enters into it, so many more scriptures fall into place:
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your
words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off
the dust of your feet. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the
land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for
that city. Matt 10:1415
For once, let the scriptures speak and not our pre-conceived
ideas!!
Why is it more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in
the day of judgment than for the city which would not accept
Jesus? The standard answer is that there are degrees of
punishment in hell. But the the text doesn't say
"HELL" does it? Furthermore, is the common conception
of hell TOLERABLE FOR ANYONE? Why are the wicked cities of Sodom
and Gomorrha being shown a level of toleration?
Notice: It's more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha
but it's at least tolerable for all in some sense or the passage is
meaningless. It is tolerable IN
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT.. NOT HELL!! That is what your Bible says.
Again, the verse refuses to teach what modern theology would demand.
Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida!
for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been
done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in
sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre
and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt
be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have
been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have
remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more
tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than
for thee. Matt 11:21-24
How long will we simply refuse to believe what we read? None
of these verses refer to our common conception of hell. Why do these verses constantly talk about this judgment
of what is supposedly "unsaved dead" as being more tolerable
for some than others?
Again, the plain, fair meaning of the actual words demands that the judgment
spoken of here be tolerable is some way for all, but more so for some than
others. Furthermore, all references are made to events which take place IN
or DURING the day of judgment, not to events following the judgment.
Continuing, we find more even more information pertaining to
this judgment. Information which simply refuses to bend to the
popular notions of judgment:
Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved,
in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon
him, and he shall shew judgment (Gk. krisis)
to the
Gentiles. He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear
his voice in the streets. A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall
he not quench, till he send forth judgment
(Gk. krisis) unto victory. Matthew 12:18-20
The Greek word for "gentiles" in verse 18 is the
same word used for "nations" in the parable of the
sheep and the goats. Furthermore the Greek word
"krisis" is used in both cases where the word
"judgment" appears. Imagine the absurdity of the
passage had they here translated krisis as
"damnation" as they did in John 5:
and he shall shew damnation?? to the Gentiles
till he send forth damnation?? unto victory
Here, the whole sense of "judgment" is one of hope.
"Judgment to the Gentiles" and "judgment unto
victory" are both used in a positive sense, not in the sense
of damnation and condemnation. Clearly a translation of John 5 which renders krisis
as "damnation" is extremely slanted.
Consider another passage:
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men
shall speak, they shall give account thereof in
the day of judgment. Matt 12:36
The verse means exactly what it says. However, upon reading a
passage like this, a strange thing happens to our
"conservative" and "orthodox" scholars.
Earlier, where the Bible clearly stated that it would be more
tolerable for some than others IN THE DAY OF JUDGMENT, they took
that to mean MORE TOLERABLE IN HELL. Why do they not
employ the same reasoning here? Why don't ANY of them teach that
man must give an account of every idle word in HELL? Why is it that we never
question such inconsistencies?
That 'resurrection to damnation' in John 5 is impossible should be obvious
from the following:
The men of Nineveh shall rise in the judgment (Gk krisis) with
this generation, and shall condemn (Gk. katakrino) it: because they repented
at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas
is here. The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment (Gk krisis) with
this generation, and shall condemn (Gk katakrino) it: for she came from the
uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon;
and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here. Matt
12:41-42
Here we see clearly and explicitly that day of judgment is the
time of the second resurrection. The men of Nineveh, and the
queen of the south "rise up" (are resurrected) in
the judgment. Is there anything in this passage, or any we
have looked at, which demands that everyone in this
resurrection, or in this judgment is lost? NO, NO, NO!!!
The implication is that the queen of the south, had she been
alive when Christ came, or had he come in her day, would have
listened to him and followed him, seeing as how she came a long
way to hear Solomon who was such a lesser one than Christ. How
then is she in a resurrection, or a judgment, to
"damnation"? The same implication is made for the men
of Nineveh., that they would have repented had Jesus went to
them. Why then are they also damned? Haven't we been taught that Old Testament saints were saved by
"looking forward to the cross"?
Notice also that the Greek word krisis is clearly the WEAKER equivalent to
the word katakrino which has been rendered 'condemn'. Imagine the
absurdity of:
The men of Nineveh shall rise in the damnation (Gk krisis) with
this generation, and shall condemn it.
Do any of these passages really fit the popular idea
of the dead, one by one being paraded before the great white
throne to have their since recounted to them, after which they
are thrown into hell? Be honest. Do any of them fit what you have
been taught about the judgment?
No they simply do not. Clearly this day of judgment is one of accountability, and
restitution with the view of recovering those who will accept
correction and accept Christ. This is clearly why
the day of judgment (NOT HELL) is MORE TOLERABLE for some than
others. Chorizan and Bethsaida heard Jesus preach and rejected
him; Sodom and Gomorrah did not. Those in the cities which heard
Jesus and refused him will be much more accountable to God in
that day. The men of Nineveh repented when Jonah preached to
them, how much more will they repent in the judgment when Christ
himself is the judge? The Queen of the South delighted to hear Solomon; how much
more will she accept Jesus when she rises to her trial and time of testing. We
will offer further scriptural proof of these points a bit later on.
Notice Peter's words in the book of Acts:
And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was
preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the
times of restitution of all things, which
God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since
the world began. Acts 3:20
These "times of the restitution of all things" refer to this day of judgment. The idea is always one of restitution,
hope, and recovery, not condemnation and damnation.
Not one biblical passage regarding this judgment states that
all who enter into it are lost. NOT ONE. It's the desire of men
to force their beliefs into the Bible that makes it impossible
for them to see this truth. God is in the business of restitution
and recovery whether a man finds salvation in this life or not.
God promised Abraham:
And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him
that curseth thee: and in thee shall all
families of the earth be blessed.
Gen
12:3
We know that the blessing was to come through Abraham's seed,
which is Christ. Did the promise of God fail? Have all
families of the earth ever been blessed? Why can't we
accept that Christ is the hope of restitution for all,
even if they don't currently realize it.
At Jesus' birth, the angels announced:
Fear not: for, behold, I bring you
good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a
Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.
Luke 2:10-11
Has the news of the savior ever been proclaimed to "all
people"? Are "good tidings of great joy" the way
we present the Gospel today? Is it really "good tidings of
great joy" that over 90% of the world's past and present
population have never even heard that God gave us a savior? Did
they angles lie? Is it good news that 85% of all who ever lived
will burn eternally?
The apostle Paul answers:
For there is one God, and one mediator between God
and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to
be testified in due time.
1 Tim 2:5-6
Jesus ransomed ALL. Was God's plan so weak that he gave his
son a ransom for all, then failed so miserably in applying the
ransom to the majority of mankind? Has this ransom ever been
testified to to all for which it was given? Paul answers that it
WILL BE testified to, but in DUE TIME. When? We answer, in the
day of Judgment, the times of the restitution of all things.
To say that the ransom was given by Jesus, accepted by the
Father, but is not efficacious upon all for whom it was given is
absurd. Yet this is exactly what most in our modern churches profess to believe. If we will stop and
realize that the problem is not, nor ever has been
"hell", we will begin to see the glory and the beauty
of God's plan. Every child of Adam was born under the death
sentence. The entire race was deemed unworthy of life, and for
the last 6000 years the tombstones have testified to the wrath of
God and the judgment upon sin.
Death has been, and continues to be mankind's greatest enemy
and greatest fear. Christ came to buy back what Adam lost, and
give his life a ransom for ALL. In doing so he bought back life
for the entire race, and hence has the just and legal right to
free EVERY ONE from the power of the grave, and from Adam's
curse. As the apostle Paul states:
For since by man
( Adam) came death, by
man (Jesus) came also the resurrection of the dead.
1 Cor 15:21
Ask the average Christian why God would raise the unjust,
only to cast them back into "hell". The standard answer
goes something like:
"So they can bow down and admit that Jesus is Lord",
or "So they can be shown their life and made to admit they
are worthy of hell"
What they fail so miserably to realize is that the unrighteous
dead need no judgment nor condemnation. They were
condemned the day they were born, and the sentence was carried
out the very day they died. As God said to Adam "For dust
thou art, and unto dust shalt thou go." As Jesus stated:
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but
he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath
not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
John 3:18
The judgment and sentence took place in Eden. Those who do not
come to Christ remain under it.
Once we realize that Christ died to ransom all from the adamic death to which we
were all liable, we must also realize that all the dead must be
raised.
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all
be made alive. 1 Cor 15:22
Being released from the judgment placed upon Adam and the
human race, these are raised so that they might be given another
judgment. In fact, they MUST be raised. Jesus bought them with
his own life, and death can no longer legally hold them. This
explains so clearly and so completely why those who fail to
obtain salvation is this last judgment are said to perish in
"the second death".
And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and
death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and
they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This
is the second death. Rev 20:13-14
God gave his only begotten Son to ransom mankind from the
first death (the adamic death) which we were all subject to. If
these fail to make restitution for past sins and come to Christ in the day of
judgment they will perish again in the second death; a death
for which no ransom will be given, and from which no one will be
released. Having counted God's ransom of little value, and
having spurned the gift and grace of God, these will be punished,
then utterly destroyed with no hope of return or resurrection.
Jesus' life was given as the corresponding price for what Adam lost.
Jesus bought our race with his own blood, and hence has obtained the right to
judge all of Adam's children, the living as well as the dead.
|